<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being an attendee&#8230; from home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanconversations.com/2009/10/14/virtual-attendee-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanconversations.com/2009/10/14/virtual-attendee-conference/</link>
	<description>Communicating in an digital, urban age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The benefits of community &#8211; offline</title>
		<link>http://urbanconversations.com/2009/10/14/virtual-attendee-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>The benefits of community &#8211; offline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanconversations.com/?p=176#comment-222</guid>
		<description>[...] Wednesday&#8217;s post about virtual conferences led to a few online and, ironically, off-line conversations about the benefits and pitfalls associated with it. This included one from a friend via Facebook that asked about what happens when you give away too much online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wednesday&#8217;s post about virtual conferences led to a few online and, ironically, off-line conversations about the benefits and pitfalls associated with it. This included one from a friend via Facebook that asked about what happens when you give away too much online. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Natta</title>
		<link>http://urbanconversations.com/2009/10/14/virtual-attendee-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Natta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanconversations.com/?p=176#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Thomas. I agree that this is a first step towards seeing what social media tools can help the preservation movement as a whole. I also believe that the issue of cost, both financially and in terms of sheer manpower, needs to be looked at closely by anyone that would consider this, especially for a conference of this scale.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing I&#039;ll say here that I&#039;ll try to elaborate on for Friday&#039;s follow-up post is the idea that even with the level of interaction that&#039;s possible using social media tools, there&#039;s still something about seeing folks face-to-face for a discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll definitely be looking forward to the live blog chat on the 23rd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Thomas. I agree that this is a first step towards seeing what social media tools can help the preservation movement as a whole. I also believe that the issue of cost, both financially and in terms of sheer manpower, needs to be looked at closely by anyone that would consider this, especially for a conference of this scale.</p>
<p>One thing I&#39;ll say here that I&#39;ll try to elaborate on for Friday&#39;s follow-up post is the idea that even with the level of interaction that&#39;s possible using social media tools, there&#39;s still something about seeing folks face-to-face for a discussion.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll definitely be looking forward to the live blog chat on the 23rd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasP</title>
		<link>http://urbanconversations.com/2009/10/14/virtual-attendee-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanconversations.com/?p=176#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Wow – loved your post, which raises some excellent questions. It deserves a long response, but I will leave just a couple of quick comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, it is absolutely fantastic that the Trust did this, and it is indeed a step in the right direction. That shared, it would have been great if the Virtual Attendee experience would have been one which more closely replicated actual attendance, by allowing viewers to interact with staff, speakers, etc.. If they did so, they might discover that the real power of social networking could free preservation and allow it to speak to a wider audience as you suggest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, I do wonder about the economics of doing this type of event in the future. It is worth noting that the Trust unveiled the Virtual Attendee page after actual, in-person registration had closed – and they may have thought that announcing it before-hand might actually have had an impact on attendance. If have a truly interactive experience would impact attendance, that, in turn, could impact the very nature of the underlying event itself. Or, in the alternative, the Trust might move to a fee-based system for viewers to obtain the live feed, which would again limit its potential impact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our statewide has been involved in social media for over 3 ½ years, has the oldest preservation blog in the country, and is extensively involved with both Twitter and Facebook. On October 23, we are hosting the country’s first live blog on social media, preservation and revitalization. The Nashville Virtual Attendee experience is sure to be on the agenda that morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow – loved your post, which raises some excellent questions. It deserves a long response, but I will leave just a couple of quick comments.</p>
<p>First, it is absolutely fantastic that the Trust did this, and it is indeed a step in the right direction. That shared, it would have been great if the Virtual Attendee experience would have been one which more closely replicated actual attendance, by allowing viewers to interact with staff, speakers, etc.. If they did so, they might discover that the real power of social networking could free preservation and allow it to speak to a wider audience as you suggest.</p>
<p>Second, I do wonder about the economics of doing this type of event in the future. It is worth noting that the Trust unveiled the Virtual Attendee page after actual, in-person registration had closed – and they may have thought that announcing it before-hand might actually have had an impact on attendance. If have a truly interactive experience would impact attendance, that, in turn, could impact the very nature of the underlying event itself. Or, in the alternative, the Trust might move to a fee-based system for viewers to obtain the live feed, which would again limit its potential impact.</p>
<p>Our statewide has been involved in social media for over 3 ½ years, has the oldest preservation blog in the country, and is extensively involved with both Twitter and Facebook. On October 23, we are hosting the country’s first live blog on social media, preservation and revitalization. The Nashville Virtual Attendee experience is sure to be on the agenda that morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acnatta</title>
		<link>http://urbanconversations.com/2009/10/14/virtual-attendee-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>acnatta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanconversations.com/?p=176#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Thomas. I agree that this is a first step towards seeing what social media tools can help the preservation movement as a whole. I also believe that the issue of cost, both financially and in terms of sheer manpower, needs to be looked at closely by anyone that would consider this, especially for a conference of this scale.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing I&#039;ll say here that I&#039;ll try to elaborate on for Friday&#039;s follow-up post is the idea that even with the level of interaction that&#039;s possible using social media tools, there&#039;s still something about seeing folks face-to-face for a discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll definitely be looking forward to the live blog chat on the 23rd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Thomas. I agree that this is a first step towards seeing what social media tools can help the preservation movement as a whole. I also believe that the issue of cost, both financially and in terms of sheer manpower, needs to be looked at closely by anyone that would consider this, especially for a conference of this scale.</p>
<p>One thing I&#39;ll say here that I&#39;ll try to elaborate on for Friday&#39;s follow-up post is the idea that even with the level of interaction that&#39;s possible using social media tools, there&#39;s still something about seeing folks face-to-face for a discussion.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll definitely be looking forward to the live blog chat on the 23rd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasP</title>
		<link>http://urbanconversations.com/2009/10/14/virtual-attendee-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanconversations.com/?p=176#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Wow – loved your post, which raises some excellent questions. It deserves a long response, but I will leave just a couple of quick comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, it is absolutely fantastic that the Trust did this, and it is indeed a step in the right direction. That shared, it would have been great if the Virtual Attendee experience would have been one which more closely replicated actual attendance, by allowing viewers to interact with staff, speakers, etc.. If they did so, they might discover that the real power of social networking could free preservation and allow it to speak to a wider audience as you suggest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, I do wonder about the economics of doing this type of event in the future. It is worth noting that the Trust unveiled the Virtual Attendee page after actual, in-person registration had closed – and they may have thought that announcing it before-hand might actually have had an impact on attendance. If have a truly interactive experience would impact attendance, that, in turn, could impact the very nature of the underlying event itself. Or, in the alternative, the Trust might move to a fee-based system for viewers to obtain the live feed, which would again limit its potential impact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our statewide has been involved in social media for over 3 ½ years, has the oldest preservation blog in the country, and is extensively involved with both Twitter and Facebook. On October 23, we are hosting the country’s first live blog on social media, preservation and revitalization. The Nashville Virtual Attendee experience is sure to be on the agenda that morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow – loved your post, which raises some excellent questions. It deserves a long response, but I will leave just a couple of quick comments.</p>
<p>First, it is absolutely fantastic that the Trust did this, and it is indeed a step in the right direction. That shared, it would have been great if the Virtual Attendee experience would have been one which more closely replicated actual attendance, by allowing viewers to interact with staff, speakers, etc.. If they did so, they might discover that the real power of social networking could free preservation and allow it to speak to a wider audience as you suggest.</p>
<p>Second, I do wonder about the economics of doing this type of event in the future. It is worth noting that the Trust unveiled the Virtual Attendee page after actual, in-person registration had closed – and they may have thought that announcing it before-hand might actually have had an impact on attendance. If have a truly interactive experience would impact attendance, that, in turn, could impact the very nature of the underlying event itself. Or, in the alternative, the Trust might move to a fee-based system for viewers to obtain the live feed, which would again limit its potential impact.</p>
<p>Our statewide has been involved in social media for over 3 ½ years, has the oldest preservation blog in the country, and is extensively involved with both Twitter and Facebook. On October 23, we are hosting the country’s first live blog on social media, preservation and revitalization. The Nashville Virtual Attendee experience is sure to be on the agenda that morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
